S1 Programme tracker
- Participant target
- 200 unique participants
- Planned workshops
- 8
- Recorded as completed
- 7
The tracker records seven completed workshops. This differs from the facilitator note.
Fictional demonstration
A report you can trace back to its sources
Inspect a prebuilt sample report, its source records, and the questions a reviewer needs to resolve. All data is synthetic. The report was prepared in advance; no live AI model generates it during your visit.
Source material
Four records support the report. Open the CSV files to inspect the register and feedback records used in the calculations.
S2 Participant register
- Register rows
- 174
- Unique participant IDs
- 168
- Duplicate entries
- 6
The register contains IDs P001 to P168, followed by six repeated entries for P001 to P006. Count each ID once when measuring reach.
Download participant register CSVInspect the first six rows and the six duplicates
| Row | Participant ID | Check |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | P001 | First occurrence |
| 2 | P002 | First occurrence |
| 3 | P003 | First occurrence |
| 4 | P004 | First occurrence |
| 5 | P005 | First occurrence |
| 6 | P006 | First occurrence |
| 169 | P001 | Duplicate |
| 170 | P002 | Duplicate |
| 171 | P003 | Duplicate |
| 172 | P004 | Duplicate |
| 173 | P005 | Duplicate |
| 174 | P006 | Duplicate |
S3 Feedback summary
- Distinct participant responses
- 40
- Positive responses
- 36
- Neutral responses
- 4
Responses are recorded for IDs P001 to P040. These responses describe satisfaction among respondents; they do not establish results for every participant.
Download feedback CSVS4 Facilitator note
8 workshops were delivered.
The note contains no pre-training or post-training assessment evidence. It conflicts with the seven workshops recorded in the tracker.
The difference must be reconciled before confirming the final workshop total.
Indicator summary
Each indicator uses a stated denominator. The workshop figure remains provisional because the two delivery sources disagree.
Participant target achievement
84%
168 ÷ 200 = 84%
Unique participant IDs after removing six duplicate entries.
Recorded workshop completion
87.5%
7 ÷ 8 = 87.5%
Tracker figure, pending reconciliation with the facilitator’s count of eight.
Positive feedback among respondents
90%
36 ÷ 40 = 90%
Positive responses among the 40 respondents, not all 168 participants.
Feedback coverage
23.8%
40 ÷ 168 ≈ 23.8%
Approximately 23.8% of verified participants provided feedback. The sources do not establish that the sample represents all participants.
Satisfaction feedback does not measure a change in skills. No pre-training or post-training assessment evidence is supplied.
Prebuilt report excerpt
Programme progress and evidence review
Prepared from the supplied sample records. Source links open the relevant record within this demonstration.
Participant reach
The register contains 174 rows. Six entries repeat existing participant IDs; counting each ID once gives 168 verified unique participants, or 84% of the target of 200. The duplicate entries are excluded from reach, rather than counted as additional people. [S1] [S2]
Workshop delivery
The tracker records seven of eight planned workshops completed, equivalent to 87.5% recorded completion. This remains provisional: the facilitator note states that eight workshops were delivered. The supplied records do not establish which count is correct, so full delivery cannot yet be confirmed. [S1] [S4]
Participant feedback
Of 40 distinct responses, 36 were positive and four were neutral: 90% positive feedback among respondents. These respondents represent approximately 23.8% of the 168 verified participants. The feedback describes this respondent group; it cannot be presented as the view of all participants, and the sources do not establish that the sample is representative. [S2] [S3]
Skills evidence
The supplied sources contain no pre-training or post-training assessment evidence. Satisfaction feedback cannot establish a measured improvement in skills. The report can describe reach, recorded delivery, and feedback received, but cannot claim measured learning gains. [S3] [S4]
Review status: workshop count unresolved. Approval remains pending.
Download sample report (English TXT)Review findings
Supported findings and evidence limits are separated from the question that still needs reconciliation.
Supported findings and limits
- Six duplicate participant entries identified. Repeated IDs P001 to P006 account for the six extra rows. [S2]
- Feedback represents 23.8% of verified participants. The 40 respondents form a subset of 168 unique IDs. [S2] [S3]
- Skills improvement cannot be established from satisfaction feedback. No comparable pre-training and post-training assessment evidence is supplied. [S4]
Unresolved question
Workshop count requires reconciliation.
The tracker records seven completed workshops; the facilitator states eight.
Which dates, attendance records, and completion evidence support the final count? Does the tracker need updating, or does the note need correcting?
Demonstration comments
These prewritten reviewer annotations illustrate the checks needed before approval.
Compare workshop dates and attendance records with both sources. Keep the 87.5% tracker figure qualified until the difference is resolved.
Confirm that repeated IDs are duplicate entries, retain the original 174-row register, and document why six rows are excluded from the reach total.
Keep the feedback denominator visible. Do not turn 90% positive feedback among 40 respondents into a claim about all 168 participants.
Request comparable assessment evidence before claiming an improvement in skills. Satisfaction responses alone cannot support that claim.